OHIO WEATHER OBSERVERS NETWORK http://sheridan.geog.kent.edu/owon E-Mail: ssherid1@kent.edu |
Cleves 3NW (James Davis) - November ended up 4.4 degrees above normal.
Kent 2W (Eric Wertz) - November 2003 was characterized by normal temperatures and slightly below normal precipitation. Measurable precipitation was observed on 14 days and measurable snowfall was noted on three days. The most active weather of the month was observed on the 12th when several tornadoes were spawned across the Buckeye state in conjunction with severe thunderstorms ahead of a potent cold front. The most intense of these tornadoes was in Wooster. The highest 24-hour precipitation total was 0.83 inches on the 28th, and the greatest 24-hour snowfall was 2.1 inches on the 29th. Total monthly liquid equivalent precipitation was 2.77. Three fog days were observed.
Kidron 1N (Ronald Hahn) - November, 2003 was the fourth warmest November of record at Kidron 1N. The high temperature record for the month was tied on the 4th at 79°. Rainfall was 0.57 inches below the normal.
Newcomerstown 1S - The average high was 5.6 degrees above normal; the
average low was 1.9 degrees above normal and the mean temperature was 3.2
degrees above normal. Snowfall was 0.1" below normal. Windiest day was the 13'th
with an average wind speed of 10.9 mph. Average wind speed for the month was 3.5
mph. Heating degree days totaled 588.7. There were six record high's either tied
or broken and two record lows tied or broken. Highest pressure was 30.68" on the
9th and the lowest pressure was 29.52" on the 19'th.
Ottawa 4E (Phil and Bonnie Higley) - Month started out very warm, with record broken Hi's. Then as the month went on, the temperature started to go down along with it. After seeing a record Hi of 77F, we never seen 70'sF again.........Been a very wet month!
Perrysville 4W (Katie Gerwig) - Near normal precip. and slightly above normal temps. High winds 12th - 13th as cold front moved in (tornadoes at Wooster evening of the 12th). Trace of snow on the 13th. First measurable snow of season 28th - 29th.
Ravenna 1E (Rich
Rabatin) - Record high of 76 on the 2nd of the month here at
Ravenna 1E. Although I did record a high of 77 on the 4th, but that was not a
record. Severe weather was also in the area on the 12th, which prompted a
Thunderstorm watch which was replaced by a Tornado Watch. Here, I had nothing,
but down to our SW and SE,they had tornadoes. Ravenna 1E also had its first
accumulating snow fall on the 29th with 4.0" of the white, wet
stuff.
Ravenna 1SE (Gary
Locke) - November was a month of extremes for Ravenna 1SE. There
was a differential of 64 degrees between the high and low temperatures of the
month. First measurable snow (4")of season fell on 11/28/03. Threat of severe
thunderstorms on 11/12/03 did not materialize at this location, however we did
experience post frontal high winds on that day and next day.
Sabina (Ron Rockhold) - Nov. was above average so this has been a year of
extremes. With a month to go we are over 40". The 30 year average is
39.2".
Sharonville 2NE (Mike Moyer) - First snowfall of the season. Recorded only a trace on two separate days.
Springfield (Dick Groeber) - Locally, this month saw a ride range of barometric pressure and temperature along with gusty winds and scattered rainfall along with the first measurable snowfall of the season. The barometric pressure range from a high of 30.71 inches of mercury on the 9th to a low of 29.63 inches on the 24th. The high reading of 30.71 inches was the fourth highest recorded here since 1968. The highest was 30.75 on the 21st in 1974 and again on the 21st in 1996. The next highest was 30.72 inches on the 30th in 1999. The temperatures were also highly variable giving periods of warm and cold. The high temperature of 78° on the 4th was the second highest for a November recorded here since 1968. The highest was 82° on the 30th in 1999. Rainfall was scattered with three main periods of notable amounts. The greatest amount was on the 27th and 28th (Thanksgiving) giving a total of 1.33 inches. The next significant precipitation was the first measurable snowfall on the morning of the 29th with 1.70 inches. The winds were gusty during the month with three significant periods. The strongest gust was on the 12th at 50 M.P.H.
Thompson 5SW (Vance Lunn)
- The first three weeks were rather mild with the mildest being the
first week. A notable exception being the 8th-10th whith a cold spell. The
period was punctuated by occasional light snowfalls. The last week saw
seasonably cold temperatures and a 4.5" snowfall which marked the beginning of
continuous seasonal snow cover.
Wooster 7N (Jack Sisler) - An F2 tornado with
winds of 110-130 m.p.h. went through the heart of Wooster on the evening of
November 12 around 7 p.m. The path was estimated to be about twelve miles long
and 50-125 yards wide. I had only minor damage since the closest I was to the
tornado path was about four miles to the south of me. The highest wind gust I
had occured the next morning after the passage of the cold front with a 46
m.p.h. gust. Damage estimates from the tornado are close to twenty million
dollars. Thousands of trees were either broken off at the trunk or completely
uprooted. The rest of the month as a whole was fairly uneventful. Mean
temperatures were almost six degrees above normal with high-temperature records
set on the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. Precipitation was below normal for the month but
still above normal for the year.
OWON # | Station | Mean Max Temp | Mean Min Temp | Mean Temp | High Temp | Date | Low Temp | Date | Total Prec | Max 24hr Prec | Date |
# Prec Days |
Total Snow | Max 24hr Snow | Date | # 1"+ Snow Days | Max Wind Gust | Date |
119 | Akron 1W | 54.0 | 38.0 | 46.0 | 78.0 | 4th | 23.0 | 10th | 2.66 | 0.95 | 27-28 | 14 | 3.10 | 3.0 | 28-29 | 2 | 22 | 12th |
A | Akron-Canton | 53.0 | 36.8 | 44.9 | 76.0 | 4th | 21.0 | 10th | 3.10 | 1.05 | 27-28 | 14 | 0.90 | 0.50 | 28th | 0 | 58 | 12th |
107 | Brookville | 55.0 | 38.4 | 46.3 | 78.7 | 4th | 21.3 | 25th | 2.85 | 1.01 | 27th | 12 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 28th | 0 | 25 | 25th |
82 | Centerville 1W | 56.1 | 38.2 | 47.1 | 78.0 | 2nd | 22.0 | 9th | 4.02 | 1.01 | 12th | 13 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 29th | 0 | 46 | 12th |
A | Cincinnati | 57.0 | 38.9 | 48.0 | 78.0 | 4th | 22.0 | 25th | 3.92 | 0.87 | 12th | 11 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 29th | 0 | 45 | 12,13 |
13 | Cincinnati 5NW | 59.0 | 40.0 | 49.5 | 79.0 | 4th | 25.0 | 9,25 | 4.77 | 1.71 | 12th | 10 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 28-29 | 0 | -- | -- |
A | Cleveland | 55.6 | 39.9 | 47.8 | 79.0 | 4th | 23.0 | 10th | 3.58 | 1.16 | 28-29 | 14 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 28-29 | 2 | 59 | 12th |
55 | Cleves 3NW | 58.6 | 38.4 | 48.5 | 80.0 | 2nd | 23.0 | 9th | 3.85 | 1.26 | 27-28 | 11 | T | T | 24th | 0 | 34 | 12th |
A | Columbus | 55.4 | 39.1 | 47.2 | 77.0 | 4th | 23.0 | 25th | 2.89 | 0.81 | 11th | 12 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 29th | 0 | 45 | 12,13 |
A | Dayton | 54.7 | 38.3 | 46.5 | 76.0 | 4th | 20.0 | 9th | 3.88 | 1.09 | 27th | 13 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 29th | 0 | 48.0 | 12th |
22 | Kent 2E | 54.4 | 36.4 | 45.4 | 77.0 | 4th | 18.0 | 10th | 2.64 | 0.83 | 28th | 14 | 1.90 | 1.50 | 29th | 1 | 28 | 13th |
430 | Kent 2W | 54.0 | 35.6 | 44.8 | 77.0 | 4th | 18.0 | 10th | 2.77 | 0.83 | 28th | 14 | 2.50 | 2.10 | 29th | 1 | 38 | 12th |
2 | Kidron 1N | 55.3 | 37.5 | 46.4 | 79.0 | 4th | 20.0 | 9, 10 | 2.62 | 0.77 | 28th | 11 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 29th | 0 | 18 | 12th |
87 | Lagrange 2SW | 55.0 | 36.9 | 46.0 | 79.0 | 4th | 18.0 | 10th | 3.36 | 1.13 | 27th | 13 | 2.10 | 1.60 | 28th | 1 | 51 | 12th |
23 | Lodi 2S | 53.9 | 36.4 | 45.2 | 78.0 | 4th | 19.0 | 10th | 2.05 | 0.53 | 27th | 11 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 28th | 0 | 49 | 13th |
A | Mansfield | 52.8 | 36.2 | 44.5 | 76.0 | 4th | 19.0 | 9th | 3.16 | 0.92 | 27-28 | 14 | 2.10 | 0.9 | 28th | 0 | 47 | 12th |
51 | Middleburg Heights 2N | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 3.14 | 1.25 | 28th | 12 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 28th | 2 | -- | -- |
Munroe Falls 1SW | 54.5 | 37.1 | 45.8 | 78.0 | 5th | 20.0 | 10th | 3.28 | 0.69 | 29th | 18 | 2.80 | 1.50 | 30th | 2 | 50 | 11,12 | |
106 | Newcomerstown 1S | 55.7 | 35.0 | 45.3 | 80.0 | 4th | 19.0 | 9th | 2.61 | 0.93 | 27-28 | 14 | 1.30 | 1.00 | 28-29 | 1 | 39 | 12 |
32 | North Ridgeville 1N | 56.0 | 38.1 | 47.1 | 80.0 | 4th | 19.0 | 10th | 3.66 | 1.41 | 28th | 16 | 1.60 | 1.30 | 29th | 1 | 45 | 13th |
15 | Ottawa 4E | 54.1 | 36.0 | 45.1 | 77.0 | 4th | 17.0 | 9th | 2.47 | 0.87 | 27th | 15 | T | T | 13th | 0 | 55 | 12th |
38 | Perry | 54.4 | 39.6 | 47.0 | 78.0 | 4th | 24.0 | 10th | 3.73 | 1.32 | 26th | 12 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 8th | 0 | -- | -- |
79 | Perrysville 4W | 54.1 | 36.8 | 45.5 | 75.0 | 4th | 19.0 | 19th | 2.70 | 0.67 | 27th | 11 | 0.70 | 0.50 | 28th | 0 | -- | -- |
101 | Ravenna 1E | 54.9 | 38.9 | 46.9 | 77.0 | 4th | 22.0 | 10th | 3.05 | 0.83 | 28th | 13 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 29th | 1 | 62 | 13th |
120 | Ravenna 1SE | 54.7 | 34.7 | 44.7 | 82.0 | 4th | 18.0 | 9th | 3.27 | 1.07 | 28th | 13 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 28th | 1 | -- | -- |
51 | Sabina | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 3.50 | 0.91 | 12th | 12 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
43 | Sharonville 2NE | 58.8 | 40.5 | 49.3 | 81.0 | 2nd | 24.0 | 25th | 3.38 | 0.96 | 12th | 12 | T | T | 28-29 | 0 | 39 | 12th |
1 | Springfield | 55.0 | 39.0 | 47.0 | 78.0 | 5th | 24.0 | 25th | 3.89 | 0.95 | 11th | 12 | 1.70 | 1.70 | 29th | 1 | 50 | 12th |
112 | Sugarcreek 2SW | 55.4 | 37.0 | 46.2 | 77.0 | 4th | 19.0 | 9th | 2.94 | 0.81 | 28th | 15 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 29th | 0 | 39 | 13th |
98 | Thompson 5SW | 51.5 | 36.1 | 43.8 | 75.0 | 4th | 20.0 | 10th | 2.86 | 0.78 | 28th | 16 | 6.10 | 4.50 | 28-29 | 2 | -- | -- |
117 | Tiltonsville | 58.0 | 38.5 | 47.6 | 82.0 | 4th | 24.0 | 10th | 3.16 | 1.09 | 19th | 14 | 0.31 | 0.25 | 29th | 0 | 42 | 24th |
A | Toledo | 53.7 | 37.0 | 45.4 | 80.0 | 4th | 20.0 | 10th | 1.99 | 0.58 | 18-19 | 12 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 28th | 0 | 61 | 12th |
16 | Wooster 7N | 54.2 | 36.1 | 45.1 | 77.0 | 4th | 18.0 | 10th | 1.96 | 0.37 | 27th | 16 | 0.70 | 0.40 | 29th | 0 | 46 | 13th |
A | Youngstown | 53.3 | 36.5 | 44.9 | 77.0 | 4th | 17.0 | 10th | 3.00 | 0.76 | 27-28 | 14 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 13th | 1 | 53 | 13th |
OWON # | Station | Mean Max Temp | Mean Min Temp | Mean Temp | High Temp | Date | Low Temp | Date | Total Prec | Max 24hr Prec | Date |
# Prec Days |
Total Snow | Max 24hr Snow | Date | # 1"+ Snow Days | Max Wind Gust | Date |
A = Airport
Date: Sat Nov 1, 2003 12:56 pm
Subject: October in Review
Hello List;
Temperatures in October were below normal, and precipitation was pretty much normal. Highest temperature took
place on the 8'th of the month ay 78 degrees. A record high of 77 was established on the 31'st. Three record lows
were established at the start of the month. Lowest temperature was 27 degrees on the 3'rd and again on the 24'th.
Pressure bottomed out at 29.35" on the 14'th of the month.
Average high was 63.0 or 2.6 below normal
Average low was 38.8 or 2.4 below normal
Mean temperature was 50.9 or 2.5 below normal
Rainfall was 2.75" or 0.05" above normal (noraml)
Highest temperature was 78 on the 8'th
Lowest temperature was 27 on the 3'rd and 24'th
Highest gust was 31 on the 14'th
Average gust was 16.7 mph
Dominating wind direction was SSW
Windiest day was the 31'st with an average wind speed of 7 mph
There were no thunder days
Heating Degree Days were 439.6
Cooling Degree Days were 4.2
There were 11 precipitation days
Don Keating #106
Newcomerstown 1S
Subject: Another One Bites the Dust!!!
At 3:07 p.m. on Monday November 3'rd, 2003, a reading of 77 degrees was hit for the daily high temperature. This
reading surpasses the record high of 71 established in 2000. And to think, a year ago today we set a record low of 22
degrees.
Don Keating #106
Newcomerstown 1S
Date: Mon Nov 3, 2003 6:41 pm
Subject: Re: Another One Bites the Dust!!!
Don and Group:
I also broke high temperature records yesterday and today; 74 degrees
both days. Tomorrow, many stations may be breaking records, some
which go back in the books quite a long ways. My highest for Tuesday
is 70 set in 1994. The high temperature record at the Ohio
Agricultural Research Center on the south side of Wooster is 74
degrees in 1964.
I don't mind seeing records set if there on the high end (ha,ha).
Looks like by the end of the week this will all be a joke.
Any other comments on our Indian Summer?
Jack
Wooster 7N
From: "Phillip Higley" <phigley@bright.net>
Date: Mon Nov 3, 2003 6:57 pm
Subject: record!!!!
Well we broke a record HI today............
Wail Toledo, Oh. didn't even get out of the 50F today,
we got in the mid 70's. Got up to 76F at 2:28 p.m..
Ray Burkholder "Offical Weather Observer" for Putnam,
Co. Told me this afternoon. The old record was 75F back
in 1987. I had 75.7F, for today HI. Where's winter or
Fall?????
Didn't have to much fog down here this morning. It
was Mtly. Clear day!
We was down to 54F for our Low temperature.
4-E
Putnam, Co.
Date: Mon Nov 3, 2003 9:33 pm
Subject: Re: [OhioWx] Re: Another One Bites the Dust!!!
Hello Jack and List;
My record high for Tuesday is 67 in 2001 so I'll bet we break that by 11 a.m. The all time record high for November
here according to my records is 79 on the 2'nd in 1982.
As for "Indian Summer" and the current pattern. I love this weather. It's great. It's a nice thing to have after the past
11 or 12 months in "the through" as it were. I know we have a temporary drop in temperatures coming this weekend,
however looking at the extended outlook, I see us rebounding back into the 60's by next Tuesday. I hate to jinx it,
but I'm starting to suspect a long term pattern change. I'm thinking that we're not going to be in a trough much of the
winter like 2002-03, but more often than not on the good side of the jet stream. Or maybe I'm just wishing? LOL.
Talk to you all later.
Don Keating
Date: Tue Nov 4, 2003 5:23 am
Subject: Cool and Fog
yesterday here in Toledo @ my station NE lucas...we had light fog all
day and ne winds...
the calandar day high was 58 at 12:05 am
dropped to 52 degrees at 7:39 am, 50 degrees @ 3:38 pm thru 4:45 pm...
49 degrees at 8:24 pm...
the afternoon high was only 51 degrees...
this morning 11/4/03 we have dense fog and 52 degrees, winds are east at
5 mph..
visibility 1/2 to 3/4 mile...overnight low was 49 at midnight then
remained in the the low 50's overnight...
looks like the warm front will make it here today!!!
mike bielski
toledo 5 ne
ne lucas
point place
Subject: All Time November Record...
Hello List;
At 2:36 p.m. Newcomerstown 1S established a new record high temperature for the date, as well as for the month of
November. The previous record high for November 4'th was 67 established in 2001. The previous all time record
high for November was 79 degrees on November 2, 1982. Today's high of 80 degrees establishes new bench marks
for the date, and the month.
It is 3:40 p.m. and currently 78 degrees. I might also add that I heard mention on a Cleveland TV weathercast last
night, that today would likely be the warmest November Election Day in Ohio's history. Did you get out and vote?
Don Keating #106
Newcomerstown 1S
Date: Tue Nov 4, 2003 6:03 pm
Subject: Message from a 2way device
List, The high temperature here today was 78
degrees recorded at 2:12 p.m.. That broke my old station record high of 75
degrees set in 1987. The last time it was this warm was in 2001 with a high
of
73 degrees. Dick Groeber.
Springfield.
Date: Tue Nov 4, 2003 6:19 pm
Subject: Most Recent 80+ Reading?
Hi List;
I was just wondering the last time I had a reading of 80 or higher. Well, it's been a while. On the 14'th of September
we had a high of 84 degrees. Not an 80 at all in October.
Don Keating #106
Newcomerstown 1S
Date: Tue Nov 4, 2003 6:45 pm
Subject: Temperature Records and Contrasts
Group:
I think numerous stations broke high temperature records including
those from official reporting points where some of those stood for 40
or 50 years. I had a 77 @ 1:58 p.m. that broke the previous record of
70 degrees set in 1994.
I was looking at a 1 p.m. hourly regional surface map and saw where
southern Michigan had partly cloudy skies with temperatures in the
lower 70's while in upper Michigan had snow showers with temperatures
in the lower 30's. Does that tell you anything?
Enjoy it while it lasts. Other comments on our Indian Summer?
Jack
Wooster 7N
Date: Tue Nov 4, 2003 10:05 pm
Subject: Re: Monday - another warm one
Dang, Barb, it's practically hot down there in Middletown! Do you
get an urban heat island effect at your station or did it just get
that warm in your area? Is middletown in southern Ohio?
My stats here: I had a 72 high on the 2nd and 3rd, and todays high
of 75 was warmer than any day in all of October (73 was October's
high). Heck, it was only 4 degrees cooler than September's maximum
reading of 79! The low for today was 48.
Vance
Date: Tue Nov 4, 2003 10:12 pm
Subject: Re: Cool and Fog
I did notice yesterday in Mentor that, while most of the area enjoyed
temps. around 70, it was in the 50's within a mile of the lake. I
could see the fog bank, but it was offshore yesterday afternoon in
the Mentor/Willoughby area.
Vance
Date: Tue Nov 4, 2003 10:14 pm
Subject: actually...
Actually, all this warm weather now is just going to slow down the
cooling of Lake Erie and create more lake-effect snow later on.
Vance
Date: Wed Nov 5, 2003 6:24 am
Subject: October's Weather Statistics for Centerville 1W
Weather statistics for the month of October for Centerville 1W.
High Temp (Date) ... 80ø / 11th
Low Temp (Date) ... 28ø / 2nd
Mean High ... 64.5ø
Mean Low ... 41.2ø
Monthly Mean ... 52.8ø
Total Precipitation ... 2.33"
Max 24 hr Precipitation (Date) ... 1.21" / 14th
Number of Precipitation Days... 7
Total Snowfall... 0.0"
Max 24 hr Snowfall (Date) ... 0.0"
Max Snow Depth at time of observation ... 0"
High Wind Gust (Date) ... 36 MPH / 14th
Thunderstorm Days ... 0
Highest Barometer (Date) ... 30.38" / 2nd
Lowest Barometer (Date) ... 29.42" / 14th
Average High Wind Gust... 16.3 MPH
Year To Date Precipitation . 40.01"
9.37" Above Normal
Robert Flory - KA5RUC
Centerville 1W
Southeast Montgomery County
Ohio Weather Observer Network #82
Wilmington NWS Skywarn ID OMT405
From: "Phillip Higley" <phigley@bright.net>
Date: Wed Nov 5, 2003 10:06 am
Subject: heat?
Yesterday we ended up with another record
HI temperarture.
We had 76.3F. Braken a old record of 75F.
I have a question to asked all of you.
How many of you are "Offical Weather
Obserers"?
And how many of you are just amateure like
myself?
4-E
Putnam, Co.
Oh, I notices this morning when I was
looking at my e-mail. Someone was talking
about the lake's staying warmer. An we may
get more lake effents snow's.
That might be true, that is if we can get of
that zone no flow & start getting NNW
winds. For me that is..
Seeing I live 65 Miles to the South West of
Toledo..
Date: Thu Nov 6, 2003 7:23 am
Subject: Re: [OhioWx] Re: Monday - another warm one
I'd say it's an urban heat island effect, Vance. I live less than half a
block from downtown, with its large brick and stone buildings.
Election Day was gorgeous. II can't remember going to the polls when the
doors were open at 8 am to catch the breezes. We hit 87.2 around 3 pm.
Middletown is in southwestern Ohio, about halfway between Dayton and
Cincinnati. Its western border is the Great Miami River (about two blocks
from where I live) and its eastern border is the I-75 area.
Barb
Date: Thu Nov 6, 2003 12:53 pm
Subject: Daily Records
Does anyone know of a site where I can locate daily weather information for
years prior to 1948? I cannot seem to locate any before January 1948, but
as I'm sure that they exist in some fashion, I would be interested in
knowing where I could go to. Thanks
Jon
Date: Thu Nov 6, 2003 3:47 pm
Subject: Re: Daily Records
Jon,
The National Climate Data Center should have all the records you
would want. However, most of the stuff on the site requires
purchasing.
Here is the site.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html
Chris
Date: Sat Nov 8, 2003 9:59 am
Subject: Record Low
At 7:09 a.m. a low temperature of 25 was established for Newcomerstown 1S. This breaks the previous record low
of 26 set in 1999. The forecast is for lows to be in the low 20s Sunday morning. From a record high of 80 degrees
set just four days ago to record lows in the low and mid 20's, needless to say it's a substantial temperature swing.
Don Keating #106
Newcomerstown 1S
Date: Sat Nov 8, 2003 8:26 pm
Subject: New Photos Added to Newcomerstown, Ohio Weather Site
Hello;
I have four different photos on my weather site now. Two new fall photos, and two older winter photos. I've added
an effect called "buttonize" to them. Make them look kinda cool. Take a peek if you'd like to. I appreciate it. Thanks.
You should go to...
http://www.angelfire.com/oh3/nctohwx/intro.html
Don Keating,
Newcomerstown, Ohio
From: "Phillip Higley" <phigley@bright.net>
Date: Sat Nov 8, 2003 8:27 pm
Subject: temperature drops's
Druing the time the moon past over the earth, our temperature drop 1
whole dergree, and as it come back later on the temperature remain
the same.......
Did anyone else do the same thing??
Between 8 p.m.-8:45 p.m.
4-E
Putnam, Co.
Date: Sat Nov 8, 2003 9:38 pm
Subject: Message from a 2way device
Don Keating, From Springfield, Ohio.
I just caught the pictures on the website and found them and the website
very impressive! How about adding my data to your
website? The webaddress: www.dicksweatherservice.com. Check it out and let me
know what you think. Also, I found tonights total
lunar eclipse totally awsome! How about you? Dick
Groeber.
Date: Sat Nov 8, 2003 10:09 pm
Subject: Re: Message from a 2way device
Group,
Don those are some nice photographs, I only wish I could take
them that good. Also saw the lunar eclipse tonight, the first time it
has been clear here during an astronomical event for I don't know how
long.
Has anyone else noticed high barometer readings today. I am now
(10:00 PM) at 30.62" and rising. This is the highest I have seen
since I started to keep records (February 2003). Anyone else have any
good observations.
Chris
Lancaster 3NE
Date: Sat Nov 8, 2003 10:22 pm
Subject: Re: [OhioWx] Re: Message from a 2way device
Hello Chris;
Thanks for your comments regarding the photos on my web site. I apprecaite it. Just takes a little creative eye and
lots of bad photos taken before I get a few I like. I've taken many more photos I didn't like than those I did like.
Pressure here is also 30.62" / 1038.9 mb, and still rising. Unisys at 9 p.m. eastern time had the center of the high
pressure somewhere near central Illinois. The highest pressure reading I noticed in Ohio was as follows...
TOLEDO METCALF CLEAR 25 17 72 NW5 30.68R TC -4
Toledo Metcalf is the airport. For those who don't know, that translates to 25 degrees with a dewpoint of 17 and a
humidity reading of 72%. Winds are NW @ 5 and the pressure is 30.68". The TC -4 means Temperature Celsius -4
degrees.
I would suggest this is a strong high for this early in the season. The center of the high is at 1041 mb but that's down
from 1043 earlier today. And to think, earlier this week many places set record high temperatures, now many record
lows may be broken tonight. Gotta love Ohio weather!
Don Keating #106
Newcomerstown 1S
Date: Sun Nov 9, 2003 7:08 am
Subject: Message from a 2way device
List, From Springfield, Ohio.
By 7 a.m. (!1-9-03) the high barometer was 30.67 inches. The highest
since (10-28--01) @ 30.62 inches of mercury. The highest previous was 30.78
inches (12-25-00). The low temp. was 24 degrees. The
station record low was 19 degrees set in 1995. The lowest since (3-30-03) @
21
degrees. Dick Groeber
Date: Sun Nov 9, 2003 12:54 pm
Subject: Record Low
At 6:56 a.m. the temperature bottomed out at 19 degrees. This broke the previous
record low. This is the coldest temperature so early in the season. The next coldest
record low is 17 on the 10'th set in 1981.
Don Keating #106
Newcomerstown 1S
Date: Sun Nov 9, 2003 7:26 pm
Subject: RE: Map Interprentation/NEOCAMS Meeting
ADVERTISEMENT
http://rd.yahoo.com/SIG=12eq5mvmo/M=259539.4
151472.5360408.1695466/D=egroupweb/S=170508
3601:LREC/EXP=1070893733/A=1892185/R=0/*h
ttp://www.lifescript.com/Begin.asp?BID=7544
http://rd.yahoo.com/SIG=12eq5mvmo/M=259539.4
151472.5360408.1695466/D=egroupweb/S=170508
3601:LREC/EXP=1070893733/A=1892185/R=0/*h
ttp://www.lifescript.com/Begin.asp?BID=7544
Gary and Group:
Good idea Gary. I'm trying now to put together some questions to ask
with some multiple choice answers to choose from that would kind of
get a general consensus from everyone. Then whoever wants to "pickup
the ball and run with it" would have something to go on.
I personally think two key issues need to be addressed regarding a
meeting on map interpretation; time and location. Time, as in morning
or afternoon and length of time for a session. I think the best
attendence at any of the meetings I've been to has either been at the
Cleveland NWS or Kent State. But this may not work well for others in
different parts of the state. Are people willing to drive three or
four hours to attend this kind of meeting? If not, perhaps a speaker
in another part of the state could give the same kind of
presentation. What about one of the TV stations? I like the Saturday
mornings also because it doesn't chop up the day but that would have
to work around the instructor's time. Length of the Meeting? Also, I
think there needs to be a strong committment from those interested in
attending. For example, if you have fifteen people say they are
interested in coming but only three attend you've kind of wasted
everyones time.
I don't know whether I should be partly to blame for some of Eric's
dilema or not. Having not attended the last meeting or talked to Eric
since then I can't say. Reason being is I had said something to him
several months ago about my sister-in-laws husband, who is a fire
department training instructor that lives in the Columbus area, to
give a presentation on fighting a major forest fire out west last
year with a fire group out of Ohio. In addition to him being a fire
instructor, he is also with the Ohio Interagency Fire Group from
Columbus which is part of a national organization of fire fighters
with the Department of Forestry. He and others make themselves
available at a moments notice to be sent anywhere in the country to
assist with major forest fires where additional help is needed. His
position, when called, is that of a branch director or resourse unit
leader that does anything from coordinating crews and various
equipment to various areas to where water drops should be made to
certain areas. He just returned from the Cedar Fire near San Diego
where one fire fighter was killed in addition to thirteen civilian
fatalities. This fire appeared to have had the most media coverage so
I'm sure many of you saw it or read about it.
We tentatively were going to set November 1st as a date that was open
for him to speak. However, with him still being "on call" with the
fire situation out West, I told Eric we would have to postpone
anything until next year. This only left Eric about two weeks to put
something else together. During our discussion he said NEOCAMS does
pay for the speakers travel expenses and lunch. This is something you
already mentioned but should perhaps be considered, especially if it
turns out to be a non-NEOCAMS meeting(s).
I would suggest to anyone who wants to continue the discussion
regarding the Saturday meeting should take it up with the NEOCAMS
officers and members. Thanks.
Jack Sisler
OhioWx Group Moderator
From: "Phillip Higley" <phigley@bright.net>
Date: Tue Nov 11, 2003 7:43 am
Subject: Brr??
Think 17 was cold, it was 3 degree's colder then what I had here in
Putnam, Co.. Ended up with 20 Degree's. I guess those reading was taken
in a dip.
We are 740' below sea leave.
An are pretty well leavel here. Flat county's here. But more row type land is
more so East & to the South of us. Isn't that where alot of storm's & snow
come in at?????????
4-E
Putnam, Co.
Date: Tue Nov 11, 2003 3:54 pm
Subject: Re: [OhioWx] Brr??
Hi Phil;
I think you mean that you are 740' above sea level?
My morning low yesterday morning was 20 degrees. Not the coldest this season, as
that was on Sunday morning with 19 degrees.
Take care and keep posting!!
Don Keating
Newcomerstown
Date: Tue Nov 11, 2003 7:00 pm
Subject: Changes On The Way
Group:
Was just looking at some models for the next 24-36 hour time period
and it looks like "Ohio reality" may be setting in.
The maps have an intensifying surface low tracking thru the eastern
Great Lakes with an associated cold front tomorrow night. By Thursday
morning the low deepens to 984 mb (29.06")over southeastern Ontario.
I'll make a the call that there will be wind advisories up by late
tomorrow and some snowbelt communities will have six or more inches
of snow by late Thursday.
Other predictions?
Jack
Wooster 7N
Date: Wed Nov 12, 2003 9:18 am
Subject: Wild Day Ahead
First possible severe thunderstorms, then high winds, then possibly the
first snow of the year. As far as the rest of the month goes, I keep
reading about the lack of sustained cold from various forecasting sources,
but this is only November. It has rarely been truly cold for any extended
period of time in this month. I don't see any real extended warmth either.
Looks more like a near normal rest of the month to me.
Jon
Date: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:18 am
Subject: Hocking Co. Rainfall.
Total rainfall for the 24 hours through 6:00 a.m. today(Wed., Nov.12)at
my weather station here in northwest Hocking County was 1.77". There was
a thunderstorm just after midnight.
Jim Fry
Rockbridge 4W
OWON #33
Date: Wed Nov 12, 2003 11:14 am
Subject: Re: [OhioWx] Hocking Co. Rainfall.
Group:
In central Fairfield county I got .55
today(through 11:00 AM) and .62 yesterday. Jim I did
notice that the Hocking River seemed high all through
Hocking County, and north of Nelsonville they had out
the high water signs for US 33. Hope we don't get to
much this afternoon.
Chris
Date: Wed Nov 12, 2003 11:57 am
Subject: Re: Changes On The Way
Jon and Group:
That may be an understatement, especially in regards to the wind.
I was just looking at the 12z ETA model and it has the Low center's
locations and pressure for the following times:
1001 mb (29.56") @12z (7 a.m.) Wednesday over eastern Minnesota
984 mb (29.06") @ 06z (1 a.m.) Thursday northeast of Lake Huron
970 mb (28.64") @ 12z (7 a.m.) Thursday north of Lake Ontario
That's a one-inch (29.56" to 28.64") pressure drop in 24 hours!!
Other than the prediction for some possible severe storms later this
afternoon I kind of look for a greater chance of possible widespread
wind damage for later tonight through tomorrow with just the pressure
gradiant of the low itself.
Everyone might want to keep an eye on their barometers/barographs and
watch for some impressive pressure drops. Other comments?
Jack
Wooster 7N
Date: Wed Nov 12, 2003 12:27 pm
Subject: Re: [OhioWx] Re: Changes On The Way
Jack and Group:
Such low pressures as you mentioned,
are especially impressive, because on the 9th we were
having some of the highest barometers seen in a couple
years for some people.
The weekly barometer graphs for the past week and this
one should be interesting.
Chris
Date: Wed Nov 12, 2003 3:57 pm
Subject: Snap, Crackle & POP!!
List;
I, like many of you, I'm sure, have been watching with amazement the watches popping up everywhere dealing with
winds, tornadic possibilities and thunderstorms possibly becoming severe. My pressure here at Newcomerstown has
dropped from 29.82 at noon to 29.71 at 4 p.m. I have a hunch it'll begin falling even sharper in a bit.
Does anyone see any similarities between this possible severe outbreak compared to November 10, 2002? And isn't
it eerie the two events being almost exactly a year apart? Comments, questions??
Don Keating
Date: Wed Nov 12, 2003 6:33 pm
Subject: Re: [OhioWx] Tornado Touchdown NorthEast of Wooster / Damage around Orrville...
Reports of damage and power outages near Wooster
and damage reports in or near Orrville being ]
heard on 147.210 MHz...
Date: Wed Nov 12, 2003 8:02 pm
Subject: Re: [OhioWx] Snap, Crackle & POP!!
Don and List:
The similarities between this event and last year crossed my mind too. I don't think it got quite as warm
today as last year (at least not here in Ravenna). As I recall that storm had a lot of wind behind it too. I'm
not sure how much of it matches up but it seems the storms formed along a similar axis at about the
same time of day and in eastern Indiana, western Ohio. It got pretty cloudy here right after lunch and it did
not get any warmer than 64 on my thermometer. That may have helped some. As I write this, I just noted
that there was evidently a report of a tornado touchdown near Wooster (hope Jack is ok). The storms
came through Ravenna between 7:15 to 7:45 and a Thunderstorm warning was issued on the tail end of
that for Portage. I don't think I heard any thunder or saw any lightning up to this point. The storm did come
thru with some wind, I don't have an anemometer but I am guessing the winds were 40 - 45 mph. Maybe
Rich got a reading. I think we lucked out.
Gary L
Ravenna 1SE
Date: Wed Nov 12, 2003 8:24 pm
Subject: Re: [OhioWx] Snap, Crackle & POP!!
I recall that last year's temps were near 70 (I can't remember
over/under, but I felt warm and knew it was going to be bad.) It was
also extremely humid and sticky for my tastes. Today just didn't feel
as bad.
I also didn't see the HUGE bow echo I saw last year. There seemed to
be a small amount of bowing when the apex was crossing through Sandusky
County, but there wasn't a solid line of storms. I was VERY anxious
last year because the storms just kept coming and keeping the same
strength almost until they reached Cuyahoga County. IMHO, the tornado
that hit Solon/Twinsburg was the "last gasp" of the storms.
Hope everyone's OK, we just got some heavy rain and gusts here in
University Circle (44106) Cleveland.
Blessings,
Liz
Date: Wed Nov 12, 2003 8:28 pm
Subject: Re: [OhioWx] Snap, Crackle & POP!!
Gary and List,
I also hope Jack is OK. I am sure he will have some
good things to write about in his e-mail. I was
thinking about heading down that way, but being it was
night time, I played it safe and watched it on TV5.
As for Ravenna 1E Gary, I had a high wind gust of 21
@ 739pm with 0.08" of rain,with no thunder or
lightning,total rainfall today was 0.24", and my high
was 65.
Rich Rabatin
Ravenna 1E
Date: Wed Nov 12, 2003 8:38 pm
Subject: Re: [OhioWx] Snap, Crackle & POP!!
Everyone;
Hello. I'm sure Jack's fine. Heck, he might have got some rope and wrangled that twister! LOL. I had a high gust of
26 mph and heard thunder one time. Rainfall from the line was 0.19". Nothing to write home about, that's for sure.
Total rain for the date has been 0.69".
Last year on November 10'th I had a high temperature of 71 degrees. Sitting at 58 currently with winds from the
WSW at 22 mph. Pressure is 29.63" and dropping again. It jumped about .04" as the line of T' Showers moved
through.
More later.
Don Keating #106
Newcomerstown 1S
From: "Phillip Higley" <phigley@bright.net>
Date: Wed Nov 12, 2003 9:50 pm
Subject: reports
WOW!!!!!!!!What a even...........Hail as big as golf ball just south of Continental, Oh., but it didn't last
long........NO precip. here when the storm went over. But the winds sure pick up.........
We had a wind gust of 55 M.P.H. at 8:30 p.m.. N.O.A.A. radio just keep going off. From 5:00 p.m. onto 6
p.m.
We ended up with these figure's for today.
Hi 61F
Low 34F
Present(at 9:30 p.m.) 41F
Precip. 0.30"
Winds WSW-14G-55
Thunderstorm early a.m.
At 9:30 p.m. it was Cldy..
Baro. was at 29.44R 0.06"
Oh, by the was he was right I am above sea level. 740'!
4-E
Putnam, Co.
Date: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:54 pm
Subject: Tornado in Wooster!
Group:
Saw some video on FOX 8 tonight of the tornado in Wooster and it
looks like it was a bad one. The Rubbermaid factory is heavily
damaged and several homes were reported leveled.
Bombogenesis taking place over the eastern Great Lakes. Pressure
gradient rapidly tightening over Great Lakes & Upper Ohio Valley.
Winds currently WSW at 24 MPH gusting to 41 MPH (at 10:45 PM) and
have gusted as high as 43 MPH at 9:42 PM. Squall line came through
here without much notice. Only picked up 0.03 inch of rain from it
(0.19 inch for the day counting the early morning showers) and I
didn't observe any thunder or lightning.
Wouldn't be surprised to see some wind gusts to near 70 MPH near the
Lake Erie Shoreline later tonight/early Thursday!!
Matt Higgins
Lodi 2S
Date: Wed Nov 12, 2003 11:20 pm
Subject: Preliminary Report for Wooster
Group:
All is well here at home. Did a lot of praying. Power here went out
about 7 p.m. and didn't return until about 10 pm. Areas in Wooster
don't expect power back until late Thursday. The closest my home was
to the path was about three or four miles to my south. Couldn't see
anything because it was totally dark.
The tornado hit about the same time the power went out. It supposidly
began about one mile west of Wooster and continued east almost
through the center of town and toward the east side where the damage
was sustained to the Rubbermaid plant. I surveyed some of the damage
by the Rubbermaid plant about a half hour after the tornado hit. This
evenings news didn't really show it all. I saw several power poles
sheared in half, numerous trees down, and debris everywhere. There
was a semi truck flipped on its side on the bypass just south of the
Rubbermaid plant.
There are reports of additional damage to homes in Wooster as well as
to the fairgrounds. A few other businesses had their roofs blown off.
Many plants have cancelled their third shift and schools are closed
for tomorrow. Only minor injuries have been reported and law
enforement officials are asking people to stay off the roadways.
Hope to have more details and pictures tomorrow which I will upload.
Jack Sisler
Wooster 7N
Date: Wed Nov 12, 2003 11:41 pm
Subject: Message from a 2way device
Group, Here in Springfield, all we're getting
is the wind. It just gusted to 50 m.p.h. at 11:19 pm.
Check the data updated every half hour at www.dicksweatherservice.com.
Jack. I'm glad you survived the storm. I cann't imagine how bad
it is there. Dick Groeber.
Date: Wed Nov 12, 2003 11:42 pm
Subject: Re: [OhioWx] Preliminary Report for Wooster
Jack;
GREAT to hear you're ok bud!! Now, do you think by what you seen the tornado had winds up to 150 mph? I aks
this because a reporter for WEWS did mention moments ago that the winds were around 150. I thought the NWS
needed to do a survey of the damage by air and on the ground?
Now another question. I understand through the same news channel that a tornado touched down near Dover, just up
I-77 from me. I know the NWS at PGH had Tuscarawas county under a severe T' Storm WARNING until about
8:15 p.m., but I hadn't heard a thing about a Tornado WARNING. Even if doppler indicated, why not issue the
warning? I'll wait til tomorrow to hear what is reported about a Tornado touchdown in Tuscarawas county, if anyone
follows up on it.
Don Keating
Newcomerstown
From: "Phillip Higley" <phigley@bright.net>
Date: Thu Nov 13, 2003 5:52 am
Subject: temperature's
WOW!!!!!!!!!!
Our first below reading temperature's.
At 5:48 a.m. the outside air tempeature is showing -5F
below zero.
with a wind chill of -40F.
Winds are still blowing strong out of the WSW -11-20
M.P.H..
BRRRRR.........
4-E
Putnam, Co.
Date: Thu Nov 13, 2003 7:46 am
Subject:
This morning saw a lot of branches/limbs down between Stow and Kent State.
A lot of debris in streets that came from trash cans, etc., that I had to
maneuver around. My rain gauge blew over but don't think I lost anything
out of it - will measure tonight.
Carol Hughes
Stow 1SE
Date: Thu Nov 13, 2003 10:33 am
Subject: Flakey
Hello List;
At 9:52 a.m. this morning, November 13, 2003, I observed the first flakes of the 2003 - 04 season. However, I only
dropped to a low temperature so far of 35 degrees.
Don Keating #106
Newcomerstown 1S
From: "Phillip Higley" <phigley@bright.net>
Date: Thu Nov 13, 2003 11:10 am
Subject: mistake!
Whoops.................I made a BIG mistake.
Found out that my unit was NOT cal. right.
So that reading I told you last night WAS NOT the low temperature for the day.
I just re-cal. my unit. Hopefully it will stay re-cal. Sorry about that folk's...........
4-E
Putnam, Co.
Date: Thu Nov 13, 2003 1:24 pm
Subject: Tuscarawas county storm
Hello List;
I decided this morning to head up to the New Philadelphia area and see if I could find the location of the wind
damage or tornado from last night. After getting to the area I realized my batteries in my digital camera were
drained, so I went to the local store and purchased more. I got the batteries in the camera, turned it on, and in 30
seconds they died! So I put the other batteries in the camera and they too died in 30 seconds! Musta been a bad pack.
At any rate, I went to the location. I didn't press my luck trying to get past the Tuscarawas county sheriff crusier
blocking the road, so I pulled to the side and looked at what damage I could.
To my right (north side of the road) I spotted many trees, of which had the top 1/3 of the trees snapped off. I also
spotted many roofing shingles in a yard to the left (south side of the road) but as I said, I didn't venture any further. I
know I wasn't able to see the destroyed houses because they were further back.
From what little I was able to see, my best guess would be that it was NOT a tornado. Just watch FOX 8 this
evening and you'll see alot of video of the storm damage there in Dover township.
Don Keating #106
Newcomerstown 1S
Date: Thu Nov 13, 2003 4:47 pm
Subject: Wooster Update
Group:
I thank Pat for the post confirming it was an F2 tornado that went
through Wooster. I've been busy most of the day taking and editing
pictures of the damage. I have begun uploading some pictures and will
continue to do so. Look under the folder "Wooster Storm" in the
Photos section. There should be a total of about 30 pictures when I'm
done. Please keep checking back.
Even though the NWS states the path may have been 50 to 125 yards
wide, I think it would be safe to say damage was in an area from one-
half to three-quarters of a mile wide. Power is still out in certain
areas and some roads are still closed in Wooster itself. Other than
structural damage to businesses and homes and power lines/poles being
down, the tree damage is something beyond words. I think I could
safely say the number of trees down are in the thousands. Many of
these were at least fifty feet high and in sound condition. Some of
the sheet metal from the businesses overlapped the power lines in
various areas. Insulation and other trash is everywhere. There was
also damage at the College of Wooster, including many of their trees
and some of the smaller homes in the area they use for student
housing. I was not able to get into that area since they had it
pretty well sealed off.
I think it's going to take several weeks to get everything cleaned
up> Power companies and tree crews from the outside were helping with
the cleanup.
I will provide updates as they become available.
Jack Sisler
Wooster 7N
Wayne County
Date: Thu Nov 13, 2003 5:13 pm
Subject: Re: [OhioWx] Wooster Update
--- meso1us <stormwarn1@msn.com> wrote:
> Even though the NWS states the path may have been 50 to 125 yards
> wide, I think it would be safe to say damage was in an area from one-
> half to three-quarters of a mile wide.
Perhaps the person who said 50-125 yards is describing the F2 damage
path rather than the entire width of the damaged area.
Regards,
Liz
Date: Thu Nov 13, 2003 5:43 pm
Subject: Dover TWP F-2 Tornado --- Preliminary
Hello List;
As i mentioned earlier, I was not able to get far into the damage area near New Philadelphia [ Dower Township ]
today, but I will be going tomorrow with fresh batteries for the digital camera and vhs-c camcorder. The following
was posted by the NWS at PGH, which has jurisdiction over Tuscarawas county.
PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE PITTSBURGH PA
111 PM EST THU NOV 13 2003
...TORNADO CONFIRMED IN TUSCARAWAS COUNTY OHIO...
THE PRELIMINARY REPORT FROM THE THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE SURVEY
TEAM IS THAT A MINIMAL F2 TORNADO STRUCK TUSCARAWAS COUNTY NEAR NEW
PHILADELPHIA WEDNESDAY EVENING. THE PATH OF THE TORNADO WAS
APPROXIMATELY 125 YARDS WIDE. WIND SPEED WAS ESTIMATED AT 120 MPH.
ADDITIONAL DETAILS WILL BE AVAILABLE LATER TODAY WHEN THE TEAM
RETURNS AND FILES A MORE COMPLETE REPORT.
I'm very interested to see this damage up close, and I will tomorrow. At the same time, I feel bad for those who
suffered damage. All I can say is thank God there was apparently no loss of life anywhere in Ohio from these
storms.
Located below you will see a map I did showing the location of the tornado compared to my location. This tornado
touched down about 16 miles NNE of Newcomerstown. My house is where the blue push pin is and the tornado
touchdown is represented [appx] with the purple tornado on the map. [Sorry, it's the only color available]. Click on
the image to view the full size. More later.
Don Keating #106
Newcomerstown 1S
Date: Thu Nov 13, 2003 5:56 pm
Subject: Ravenna 1E Winds
List,
First off, good pictures Jack, and I am glad you are safe and
sound!!
Here at Ravenna 1E, this morning I had a high wind gust of 62mph
at 137am. Since I had several brief outages, the computer I have my
Wx station on shut down, and could not record my readings on Weather
Underground until I reset the computer at 515 am. So I had to
scroll through my control panel to find the high gust. The wind
gust tore off the gutter on the front of my house on the 2nd floor.
The storm last night came through Ravenna with little fanfare.
Once again, glad you made it safe through the tornado Jack.
Rich Rabatin
Ravenna 1E
Portage County
Date: Thu Nov 13, 2003 7:18 pm
Subject: Lodi 2S Wind Gust & Wooster Tornado
Hi Group:
The peak wind gust today at Lodi 2S was 49 MPH at 7:50 AM. The wind
was strong enough to blow down a dead tree at the back of my lot.
Other than that I was hard pressed to find any damage of consequence
in the local area.
Jack, I'm glad to see that you made it through the "Wooster Tornado"
without a scratch! Wayne county seems to be a magnet for November
tornadoes as of late (West Salem-Burbank on Nov. 10th last year and
now Wooster yesterday). Who needs to live in Oklahoma?! I'm
curious, did you observe any lightning from the storm that passed
through your area yesterday evening. I was observing from up here
in the Lodi/Burbank area and I couldn't see any from my vantage
point looking down your way about the time the tornado struck. I
figured that the tornado passed about 15 miles south of me but I
didn't think that the visibility was so poor that I couldn't see
distant lightning. Again, just curious!
Take Care,
Matt Higgins
From: eobic <eobic@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu Nov 13, 2003 11:16 pm
Subject: Report on Tuscarawas County F2 Tornado
PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE PITTSBURGH PA
628 PM EST THU NOV 13 2003
..TORNADO HITS NEW PHILADELPHIA AREA OF TUSCARAWAS COUNTY...
ABOUT 800 PM ON 12 NOVEMBER 2003...AN F2 TORNADO TOUCHED DOWN NEAR
MAY RD JUST OFF OF ROUTE 52 TO THE WEST OF NEW PHILADELPHIA. IT
TRAVELED TO THE EAST-NORTHEAST ABOUT 45 MPH DAMAGING SEVERAL HOUSES
ALONG CROOKED RUN ROAD. SEVERAL HOMES SUFFERED SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE
WITH THEIR ROOFS COMPLETELY TORN OFF. SOME WALLS WERE ALSO TOPPLED.
SEVERAL GARAGES AND BARNS ALSO SUFFERED SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE. A FEW
GARAGES WERE COMPLETELY DESTROYED. MANY TREES AND POWER LINES WERE
DOWNED. THE PATH TOOK THE TORNADO ACROSS INTERSTATE 77 AND INTO NEW
PHILADELPHIA WHERE SCATTERED DAMAGE OCCURRED TO ABOUT 12 HOMES. THE
MOST SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE OCCURRED ALONG THE CROOKED RUN ROAD AREA
WHERE THE PATH WIDTH WAS DETERMINED TO BE ABOUT 175 YARDS. THE PATH
LENGTH WAS ABOUT 3.5 MILES AND THE MAXIMUM WINDS WERE ESTIMATED TO
BE ABOUT 120 MPH.
MEANWHILE...IN THE ATWOOD LAKE AREA OF CARROLL COUNTY...A MICROBURST
PRODUCED A SWATH OF DAMAGE ALONG MENLO DRIVE OFF OF ROUTE 542. THE
DAMAGE EXTENDED ABOUT 200 YARDS AND IT WAS ABOUT 50 YARDS WIDE.
MAXIMUM WINDS WERE ESTIMATED TO BE ABOUT 60 MPH. NUMEROUS TALL PINE
TREES WERE SNAPPED. SEVERAL TREES FELL ONTO HOUSES AND SHEDS.
THE F2 TORNADO NEAR NEW PHILADELPHIA IS THE STRONGEST TORNADO TO
OCCUR WITHIN THE COUNTY WARNING AREA OF THE NATIONAL WEATHER IN
PITTSBURGH THIS YEAR. THIS INCLUDES 15 COUNTIES IN WESTERN
PENNSYLVANIA...11 COUNTIES IN EAST-CENTRAL OHIO...9 COUNTIES IN
NORTHERN WEST VIRGINIA...AND GARRETT COUNTY MARYLAND. ONE F0
OCCURRED IN MERCER COUNTY ON 21 JULY 2003 AND ANOTHER F0 TORNADO
OCCURRED IN ALLEGHENY COUNTY ON 12 JUNE 2003.
LOOKING BACK AT THE RECORD BOOKS FOR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY...
DATE F SCALE
APRIL 13 1952 F1
MARCH 11 1955 F2
JULY 22 1958 F3
MAY 8 1961 F1
JUNE 25 1968 F1
JULY 10 1973 F0
JUNE 7 1978 F1
JUNE 7 1980 F1
THE LAST TIME TUSCARAWAS COUNTY SAW AN F2 TORNADO WAS MARCH
11TH...1955.
11/12/03 TORNADO SUMMARY
TIME - 800 PM
FSCALE - F2
MAXIMUM ESTIMATED WINDS 120 MPH
PATH LENGTH - ABOUT 3.5 MILES
PATH WIDTH - ABOUT 175 YARDS
LOCATION - ABOUT 3 MILES WEST-SOUTHWEST OF NEW PHILADELPHIA TO NEW
PHILADELPHIA.
KANE/COBLEN
Date: Fri Nov 14, 2003 11:32 am
Subject: Wooster Update
Group:
Here is some additional information regarding the damage and a few
observations:
1. Three dozen homes sustained damage
2. Eleven to fifteen industries had substantial damage. Some
buildings totally destroyed.
3. At the Wayne County Maintainance Building large snowplows were
picked up and tossed from the tornado. One inch tree limbs were
sticking through the building.
4. Total damage will likely be in the millions city-wide
5. Part of the tornado's path took it between two grade schools (with
a combined enrollment of almost 500 kids) with only minor damage to
the schools.
6. I saw national media coverage of the Wooster tornado on MSNBC, Fox
News and TWC (The Weather Channel)
I took some additional pictures this morning and hope to have them
uploaded shortly. Some additional streets have opened but some are
still closed.
Will have more to post later I'm sure. I have saved copies of the
local newspaper articles and pictures as well as pictures from my
35mm camera of the damage. Will try to put all this together in a
more organized manner for everyone to see at a later date (NEOCAMS
meeting, get-together, etc.)
Jack Sisler
Wooster 7N
Wayne County
Date: Fri Nov 14, 2003 4:07 pm
Subject: New Philadelphia, Ohio Tornado Information
Hello Everyone;
I went to the New Philadelphia, Ohio [Dover Township] tornado location this morning. Had I seen the damage
yesterday that I seen today, I would not have hesitated for a moment on whether or not it was a tornado or strong
winds that went through the area. I have uploaded 18 photos to the group photos section. I have also creature a link
right underneath my title graphic on my home page where you can click on the link to read a brief summation, see
the NWS report on the tornado, see the 18 photos and a map of the location as well as links to four newspaper
articles near the bottom of the report. Go to http://www.angelfire.com/oh3/nctohwx/intro.html and just below where
it says where you are, you'll see the link. Click it to get to the report. In short, I was amazed at what I observed.
Don Keating,
Newcomerstown 1S
Date: Fri Nov 14, 2003 4:31 pm
Subject: Re: Lodi 2S Wind Gust & Wooster Tornado
Matt:
At first, I was going to say I saw one "flash" of lightning to my
southwest. However, I recall NOT hearing any thunder, especially at
that distance. My instincts tell me it was not thunder but a power
flash from one of the transformers that were hit when the tornado was
entering the west side of Wooster. I did see lightning to the east
and southeast after the storm cleared the area. That was somewhat
eerie also because you would see lightning toward the bottom half of
the horizon and a moon/stars at the top half of the sky.
Also, my wife works with this woman who lives by Rubbermaid but was
not hit by the tornado. Her house is near railroad tracks. Of course
if you have lived near railroad tracks for any length of time you
become accustomed to the noise when a train goes by. This time she
said she heard the "roar" of what she thought was just another train
going through. A split-second later though she was saying to
herself, "there was no whistle with that train! She immediately
headed toward the basement!! My wife says she still gets upset when
she talks about it.
Jack
Wooster 7N
Date: Fri Nov 14, 2003 6:45 pm
Subject: Re: New Philadelphia, Ohio Tornado Information
Don and group:
The only good thing, is that it appears, according to
pictures and the map, to be out in the "country", and not in New
Philadelphia corp. And, like it usually is when there are tornado
damage pictures, it looked like a beautiful day, blue sky etc...
Chris
Lancaster 3NE
Date: Fri Nov 14, 2003 6:50 pm
Subject: Preliminary Damage Figures on Wooster Tornado
Group:
Although I've heard a few different damage estimates, they are all
around the estimate of 15 million dollars. At first this may seem
kind of high but, considering that it appears the major damage was on
the west side of Wooster, it doesn't surprise me. Many of the
industrial plants are located on the west side. Damage and/or loss
was not only to the structure itself but to the machinery and
contents within.
Jack
Wooster 7N
Date: Fri Nov 14, 2003 6:54 pm
Subject: Re: [OhioWx] Re: New Philadelphia, Ohio Tornado Information
Chris;
I should state that the pictures on the report I posted today were taken today, not Wednesday. On Wednesday, for the
most part, it was a cloudy day here in Tuscarawas county, with only a few peeks of sunshine now and then. It was in
a typical "rural" area when it hit. Had it waited another minute to develope, it would have been a much worse
situation, similar to the Wooster situation.
Don Keating
Date: Fri Nov 14, 2003 8:20 pm
Subject: Re: [OhioWx] Re: Lodi 2S Wind Gust & Wooster Tornado
Jack & List:
Glad to hear you are ok. The story about the train tracks is interesting becuase when I was growing up we
lived between two sets of tracks. I can't tell you how many stormy nights I spent hearing trains and
wondering if they were trains. We have a railroad near where we live now and I find myself wondering the
same thing some times. Just wondering with all these comments about lack of lightning and thunder, what
the chances are of having a "storm" spawn a tornado without lightning and thunder? I wouldn't think that it
would be very likely at all. Any thoughts from others?
Gary L
Ravenna 1SE
Date: Fri Nov 14, 2003 8:31 pm
Subject: Re: [OhioWx] Re: Lodi 2S Wind Gust & Wooster Tornado
Hi Gary;
Wednesday night as the line was passing here, I only heard a faint clap of thunder once. No lightning at all. And I'm
just 16 miles SSW of where the tornado in Tuscarawas county first touched down. I thought it was kind of strange as
well with all of the severe T' Storm warnings that were issued.
Don Keating
Date: Sat Nov 15, 2003 3:29 am
Subject: Re: Lodi 2S Wind Gust & Wooster Tornado
Here at my place in Thompson 5 SW, I had a tree uprooted and fallen
into the front yard. Its crown fell over my new weather tower still
under contruction. Remarkably didn't seem to damage the anemometer,
which is already installed on the tower (it hadn't been working due
to unrelated problems). Some other smaller trees were felled in the
woods also. By the Beaufort Scale this indicates winds of around 60
mph. No thunder here-just a lot of wind and 1 inch of snow.
Vance
Date: Sat Nov 15, 2003 8:01 am
Subject: Re: [OhioWx] Re: Lodi 2S Wind Gust & Wooster Tornado
Jack (and Group):
The really scary thing about the "non-existance" of lightning and thunder is that it would take people that much
longer to catch on to the fact that a tornado was bearing down on them. If it wasn't for the sound of the wind, your
wife wouldn't have been tipped off. Not only that, it took her a few seconds to realize that it WASN'T a train..that's a
few seconds someone else may not have had. In a "textbook" tornadic situation (or as we think of one), there is
usually quite a bit of lightning & thunder activity to alert one to pay close attention to the weather. To add insult to
injury the storm struck after sunset (it was dark) so visual observation of the sky was difficult & couldn't really be
used effectively as an early warning device. Albeit, there was a Tornado Watch issued by SPC and the CLE NWS
did issue a Tornado Warning for Wayne Co. (but I'm afraid that the warning may have been issued "too late" for
Wooster..no fault of the NWS..it takes time to dissemenate the information).
In summary, I'm surprised that the impact on human (& animal) life wasn't greater considering those factors.
Matt Higgins
Date: Sat Nov 15, 2003 3:25 pm
Subject: Tornado Info for Ohio Weather Journal
Group:
Ron Hahn, editor and publisher of the Ohio Weather Journal, called me
last night to say he wants to write an article about the Wooster
tornado and perhaps the one in Tuscarawas County.
I've put together quite a bit of information (photographs, maps,
articles, etc.) but I need some help in getting a copy of a radar
picture around the 7 p.m EST Nov. 12 (00z Nov 13) time frame. I
suppose a short range base reflectivity picture would be good but
I'll take what anybody can get. Also, an infrared satellite picture
about the same time period would be nice.
Please send it to my personal email; stormwarn1@msn.com. Ron doesn't
have an email address which is why I'm asking for the information.
Would like to have something sometime next week if possible.
Thanks.
Jack
Wooster 7N
Date: Sat Nov 15, 2003 4:28 pm
Subject: Storms and Wooster Tornado
All:
I had at least half a dozen lightning flashes/thunder at my place in
beautiful
Parma when the storms went through last Wednesday. They were quite noticeable
since it had gotten dark. At least one strike was close as the thunder was
quite
loud and quick. Of course Parma is a long way from Wooster. It was my day
off.
The NWS tornado warning for Wayne County was issued at 644 PM and the tornado
supposedly touched down at 7 PM for a 16 minute lead time.
Jim Kosarik NWS Cleveland
Date: Mon Nov 17, 2003 4:43 pm
Subject: Additional Tornado Damage Photos Available to View
Hello Everyone;
I discovered the Times Reporter newspaper has a special photo section of tornado damage in the Dover Township
area. I have placed a direct link to that photo section on my special report page at
http://www.angelfire.com/oh3/nctohwx/dovertwp.html . You may scroll down near the bottom and click the link
where it says *Added 11/17/2003. An yes, that is snow in the air and on the ground.
Don Keating,
Newcomerstown
Date: Tue Nov 18, 2003 8:50 am
Subject: Looks like things might be changing
Looks like we might be in for about 2 more big rainstorms, todays and
another one coming in about 7-10 days. Most models seem to be hinting that
after the second of these two, our warmer weather might be ending for
awhile. Not sure of the details, but it would be toward the end of the
month, after Thanksgiving. Overall, so far, the month has been only
slightly above normal up to this point, even after the near record warm
start. In the short term, a lot of rain today and tonight, watch out for
some flooding.
Jon
Date: Tue Nov 18, 2003 12:43 pm
Subject: Re: [OhioWx] Looks like things might be changing
Hello Jon and List;
I concour with you about at least one more rain storm, and that'll be tonight through the first part of tomorrow. I
disagree, though, about the "warmer" temperatures changing. I have heard a forecaster on a Columbus TV station
advertise two big "snow" events in the past two weeks. The first of these two events was to be this event arriving
today through tomorrow. Now, that same forecaster is advertising a snow event around the time of Thanksgiving.
This time of the year, or any time of the winter season, I just don't see how one can forecast a major event including
snow seven to 10 days in advance. I guess they can get away with it because the general public lives in the "present"
generally speaking.
I've also heard a Cleveland forecaster go way overboard on at least two events, in the short term forecasts. One even
went as far as to predict at least four inches of lake effect after the last cold front moved through (last Wednesday
night) when the most I seen reported the next day was just one to two inches.
Long story short, on the 10 day outlooks I've seen, I do see a cool down, but nothing significant. Snow? Sure, it's
November. Important snows... I won't stick my neck out that far, lol. Just my opinions, nothing personal.
Don Keating
Date: Tue Nov 18, 2003 7:06 pm
Subject: Photo submission...
Hello Everyone;
I thought I'd let you know about some good news I received today. Back on November 4'th I submitted a photo I
took of the brilliant sunset the cloud layers from Isabel made over Newcomerstown. Well, today I received this e-
mail, in part....
I am pleased to announce that your picture has been used in one of the WeatherMatrix Calendars for 2004. Due to
the number and resolution of submissions, three calendars were created, a 12-month 12-page Calendar and two 1-
page Calendar Prints with 12 smaller photos each. Your photo was accepted for the:
1-Page Calendar Print
I thank you again for your submission and for helping WeatherMatrix achieve its goals in 2004. 100% of profits
from the sale of these calendars will go to support the WeatherMatrix website.
The photo is attached below.
Take care everyone,
Don Keating
Date: Tue Nov 18, 2003 7:49 pm
Subject: Thanks
Group:
I'd like to say thanks to many of you in two ways. First, to all
those who have contacted me during the past week regarding the status
of my well-being and safety of my family and I after the Wooster
tornado and second, to those who have helped provide me with
information on the tornado (images, pictures, etc.).
I have gathered a great deal of information on the "Wooster Tornado"
and will be providing Ron Hahn with copies for an article he will be
doing on the storms of November 12 in an issue of the "Ohio Weather
Journal". (The next issue I think). As soon as things settle down I
hope to put some additional information (radar images, more damage
photos, etc)in the photos and files sections.
Please remember if any of you have anything of interest in your
own "backyard" take advantage of the sections on the left.
Thanks again.
Jack
Wooster 7N
Date: Fri Nov 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Subject: Enjoy It While You Can
Group:
Mean temperatures have been running almost six degrees above normal
for the month. I had a high of 63 today which was one degree below
the record high of 64 set in 1999.
On another note regarding the Wooster tornado. Damage estimates are
now up to 20 million dollars. It doesn't appear their will be any
disaster relief coming from the state or federal governments because
many of the victims have enough insurance to cover the damages. It's
still a miracle that there were no serious injuries or deaths.
Jack
Wooster 7N
Date: Sat Nov 22, 2003 3:57 pm
Subject: Ohio NWS forecast discussions (comparison)
Hello, everyone,
I just read the afternoon (Saturday) forecast discussions from the Cleveland and Wilmington NWS offices. The one
from Cleveland is four lines long and the one from Wilmington is five paragraphs long. The discussions are
available from the respective NWS Web sites or at http://iwin.nws.noaa.gov/iwin/graphicsversion/bigmain.html.
From reading NWS forecast discussions for several years, the early-morning and afternoon discussions are usually
lengthy, because the forecaster is interpreting the 00Z and 12Z model runs, respectively. The late-morning and
evening discussions tend to be shorter, more of an update.
It would be nice to have read a more lengthy discussion from Cleveland, especially considering that a strong cold
front will cross the state tomorrow night and early Monday and there is the potential of severe thunderstorms.
I would appreciate if anyone else would share his/her thoughts.
Shawn Trueman
Huron, OH
Date: Sun Nov 23, 2003 11:23 pm
Subject: So Far .....
Today's high of 69 made this the 11'th day in November with a high of 60 or higher. There have been three days of
70 or higher and one day of 80 or higher. Boy, I hope ol Mother Nature doesn't decide to wallop us later but I fear
that she might. What do you all say?
Don Keating,
Newcomerstown
Date: Mon Nov 24, 2003 7:21 am
Subject: Re: [OhioWx] So Far .....
I think we're going to get zapped, Don. It's just been too darn nice.
After a high of 70 yesterday, we're at 45.1 with a wind chill of 34 now.
Temperature has been dropping 3-4 degrees an hour. A bit of snow is still
in the forecast for this afternoon.
Barb
Middletown OH
From: "Phillip Higley" <phigley@bright.net>
Date: Mon Nov 24, 2003 10:02 am
Subject: Re: [OhioWx] So Far .....
I go along with Barb. It's been to nice for this time of year. Yesterday
we had a Hi tempeature of 67F & right now the temperature been dropping off
.3-.5 a degree within the last 1/2 hour. Just momment ago it was 30F Now
its 29.2F & con't. to drop.....We had some snow shower's this morning with a
Tr. on the ground by 8 a.m. For a while there, I thought we might get .5 or
so, cause it was really coming down. The winds so far been up to 32 M.P.H.,
but I have taller trees to the west & to the North here. So the winds could
be higher. Great thing oh, the baro. is on the way up, at 29.59R .06", but
the temperature is on the way DOWN.
Here is what we have so far today.
Hi-61.6F@10:50 p.m. yesterday
Low-29.1F right now
Precip. 0.28"
Snowfall Tr.
Winds WSW-15
4-E
Putnam, Co.
Date: Mon Nov 24, 2003 10:09 am
Subject: Re: [OhioWx] So Far .....
"Boy, I hope ol Mother Nature doesn't
decide to wallop us later but
I fear that she might.
What do you all say?"
I say, if God (KJV) desires to judge (wallop)
us later, He will.
- Patrick
Date: Wed Nov 26, 2003 8:19 am
Subject: Re: Ohio NWS forecast discussions (comparison)
Shawn and Group:
I've always thought Wilmington's forecast discussions were longer
than Cleveland's most of the time but I didn't know if it was just me
or what. As you say, anything that usually comes out late morning or
early afternoon are just updates.
I think many times it will depend on the time factor. If a particular
day is exceedingly busy because of severe weather or behind schedule
it probably cuts down on their time element to get something out in
an alloted time period.
Maybe Jim Kosarik from the NWS Cleveland will comment.
Jack
Wooster 7N
Date: Thu Nov 27, 2003 12:14 pm
Subject: Weather Calendars Available
Hello Everyone;
I received word this morning that the 2004 weather calendars from Weather Matrix are now available. You can go to
http://www.weathermatrix.net/calendar/
for complete ordering information. The calendars do look nice, and no, that's not a biast opinion because my photo is
used. They do look good and have some impressive photos on them. Take care everyone and Happy Thanksgiving
to you and yours.
Don Keating
Date: Fri Nov 28, 2003 5:07 pm
Subject: Re: Weather Calendars Available
Group:
In case you can't locate Don's photo easily on the Weather Matrix
website, it will be in Group # 2. I just ordered mine.
Jack
Date: Sat Nov 29, 2003 11:14 am
Subject: Message from a 2way device
List, From Springfield, Ohio.
The first measureable snowfall of the season fell here last night from
minight to 5 a.m. totaling 1.7 inches melted to .09 inches water. Winds
gusted
to 31 m.p.h. blowing the snow. Dick Groeber.
Date: Sat Nov 29, 2003 1:48 pm
Subject: First measureable snowfall of the season at Lodi 2S
Group:
The first measureable (accumulating) snow of the season occurred at
Lodi 2S last night. 0.4 inch of snow fell during the 24-hour period
ending at 8 AM today.
Matt Higgins
Lodi 2S
Date: Sat Nov 29, 2003 2:05 pm
Subject: Snow in Ravenna
List:
As of 9 AM Saturday morning, I had measured 4" of snowfall since Friday evening (same amount on the
ground). My total precipitation for the 24 hr period ending at 9 AM Saturday was 1.07". This was also my
first measurable snowfall of the season.
Gary Locke
Ravenna 1SE
OWON #120
Date: Sun Nov 30, 2003 10:35 am
Subject: Re: Forecast Discussion
All:
There was some brief discussion last week about the length of the NWS
forecast
discussion. I believe there is a trend for shorter NWS discussions and it
probably is more evident at CLE than some other sites (we tend to have more
weather than some sites away from the lakes).
We have been tasked with doing the forecast graphically (you can see the
experimental graphics on our web site and on some national NWS sites). This
has
consumed a lot more of our time. Unfortunately other products due at the same
time have suffered (in my opinion) because our time is limited. Some folks
have
just
thrown out a few thoughts in their discussion and not spent the time they may
have previously.
There is little guidance in creating the forecast discussion. It is different
by
office and by forecaster. This will always be the case to some extent. I will
pass on your concerns to the staff. I believe the discussion is one of our
most
important products but some forecasters do not, they would rather devote
their
time to the forecast. It is a valid argument. Hopefully we can find some
compromise. As long as the NWS keeps asking us to do more with less staff
(there
are new staff cutbacks proposed as we speak) I am afraid that our products
and
service in general will suffer.
Jim Kosarik
NWS Cleveland